|
PIYA SINGH [TIMES NEWS NETWORK [ TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER
23, 2003 12:37:20 AM ]
MUMBAI: The finance ministry
has informally instructed the income-tax (I-T) department
to go slow on search and seizure operations. Searches or raids
will now be conducted only if they are expected to yield clinching
evidence in a case, or if the tax department does not have
any information whatsoever on an assessee and can detect evasion
only through this route.
A top income-tax official said, “Although this is not
a written instruction, it has been communicated to the investigations
department of all income-tax circles. In fact, we have already
reduced the number of searches.
Over the last three months, only a handful
of searches have been conducted in the metros.’’
While there is much speculation in North Block that the finance
ministry’s move has much to do with the impending elections,
the official denied it. Instead, he said that the tax-department
is putting in place a data bank which will track tax returns
of assesses and any major expenditure incurred.
This data will largely eliminate the need to raid assessees,
as it will be possible to get a fix on undisclosed income
with the data on hand.
Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) chairman
P.L. Singh has also recently said that the board is developing
a data bank on assessees, which will improve the quality of
assessments and revenue and could lead to a reduction in raids.
The deadline for this data bank has not been announced.
However, income tax sources said that the
department is likely to be fully online by 2005, and it is
only then that it will be possible to monitor assessees completely.
“We will conduct searches if necessary
even before this data bank is in place. But post-2005, if
the department’s computerisation plan is on track, the
need for an investigations department to conduct searches
may be minimal,’’ said the official.
Tax consultancy Bharat S. Raut partner Sudhir
Kapadia said, “Developed economies have a compliance
driven regime, not one that is centred around search and seizures.
For instance, in the United States, the IRS is dreaded on
account of its audits, not its search operations. The tax
department should move to a system in which technology is
utilised to gather evidence on tax-payers and reprisals are
severe in cases of fraud.’’
However, the big challenge for the tax department
will be to check evasion in the parallel economy, where it
is difficult to track expenditures as well as to determine
incomes accurately, he added.
|