|
Statements of Accounting Standards (AS 19)
Leases
(In this Accounting Standard, the standard
portions have been set in bold italic type. These should be read
in the context of the background material which has been set in normal
type, and in the context of the ‘Preface to the Statements of Accounting
Standards’.)
The following is the text of Accounting Standard
(AS) 19, ‘Leases’, issued by the Council of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India. This Standard comes into effect in respect of all
assets leased during accounting periods commencing on or after 1.4.2001
and is mandatory in nature from that date. Accordingly, the ‘Guidance
Note on Accounting for Leases’ issued by the Institute in 1995, is not
applicable in respect of such assets. Earlier application of this Standard
is, however, encouraged.
Objective
The objective of this Statement is to prescribe,
for lessees and lessors, the appropriate accounting policies and disclosures
in relation to finance leases and operating leases.
Scope
1. This Statement should be applied
in accounting for all leases other than:
- lease agreements to explore for or use natural
resources, such as oil, gas, timber, metals and other mineral rights;
and
- licensing agreements for items such as motion picture
films, video recordings, plays, manuscripts, patents and copyrights;
and
- lease agreements to use lands.
2. This Statement applies to agreements that
transfer the right to use assets even though substantial services by the
lessor may be called for in connection with the operation or maintenance
of such assets. On the other hand, this Statement does not apply to agreements
that are contracts for services that do not transfer the right to use
assets from one contracting party to the other.
Definitions
3.
The following terms are used in this Statement with the meanings specified:
A lease is an agreement whereby the lessor conveys
to the lessee in return for a payment or series of payments the right to
use an asset for an agreed period of time.
A finance lease is a lease that transfers substantially
all the risks and rewards incident to ownership of an asset.
An operating lease is a lease other than a finance
lease.
A non-cancellable lease is a lease that is cancellable
only:
- upon
the occurrence of some remote contingency; or
- with
the permission of the lessor; or
- if
the lessee enters into a new lease for the same or an equivalent asset
with the same lessor; or
- upon
payment by the lessee of an additional amount such that, at inception,
continuation of the lease is reasonably certain.
The
inception of the lease is the earlier of the date of the lease
agreement and the date of a commitment by the parties to the principal
provisions of the lease.
The lease term is the non-cancellable period for which the lessee
has agreed to take on lease the asset together with any further periods
for which the lessee has the option to continue the lease of the asset,
with or without further payment, which option at the inception of the
lease it is reasonably certain that the lessee will exercise.
Minimum lease payments are the payments over the lease term that
the lessee is, or can be required, to make excluding contingent rent,
costs for services and taxes to be paid by and reimbursed to the lessor,
together with:
- in
the case of the lessee, any residual value guaranteed by or on behalf
of the lessee; or
- in
the case of the lessor, any residual value guaranteed to the lessor:
- by
or on behalf of the lessee; or
- by
an independent third party financially capable of meeting this guarantee.
However,
if the lessee has an option to purchase the asset at a price which
is expected to be sufficiently lower than the fair value at the date
the option becomes exercisable that, at the inception of the lease,
is reasonably certain to be exercised, the minimum lease payments
comprise minimum payments payable over the lease term and the payment
required to exercise this purchase option.
Fair
value is the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or a
liability settled between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm's
length transaction.
Economic
life is either:
- the
period over which an asset is expected to be economically usable by
one or more users; or
- the
number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the
asset by one or more users.
Useful
life of a leased asset is either:
- the
period over which the leased asset is expected to be used by the lessee;
or
- the
number of production or similar units expected to be obtained from the
use of the asset by the lessee.
Residual
value of a leased asset is the estimated fair value of the asset at
the end of the lease term.
Guaranteed
residual value is:
- in
the case of the lessee, that part of the residual value which is guaranteed
by the lessee or by a party on behalf of the lessee (the amount of the
guarantee being the maximum amount that could, in any event, become
payable); and
- in
the case of the lessor, that part of the residual value which is guaranteed
by or on behalf of the lessee, or by an independent third party who
is financially capable of discharging the obligations under the guarantee.
Unguaranteed
residual value of a leased asset is the amount by which the residual
value of the asset exceeds its guaranteed residual value.
Gross
investment in the lease is the aggregate of the minimum lease payments
under a finance lease from the standpoint of the lessor and any unguaranteed
residual value accruing to the lessor.
Unearned
finance income is the difference between:
- the
gross investment in the lease; and
- the
present value of
- the
minimum lease payments under a finance lease from the standpoint
of the lessor; and
- any
unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor, at the interest
rate implicit in the lease.
Net
investment in the lease is the gross investment in the lease less
unearned finance income.
The
interest rate implicit in the lease is the discount rate that,
at the inception of the lease, causes the aggregate present value of
- the
minimum lease payments under a finance lease from the standpoint of
the lessor; and
- any
unguaranteed residual value accruing to the lessor, to be equal to the
fair value of the leased asset.
The
lessee's incremental borrowing rate of interest is the rate of
interest the lessee would have to pay on a similar lease or, if that is
not determinable, the rate that, at the inception of the lease, the lessee
would incur to borrow over a similar term, and with a similar security,
the funds necessary to purchase the asset.
Contingent
rent is that portion of the lease payments that is not fixed in amount
but is based on a factor other than just the passage of time (e.g., percentage
of sales, amount of usage, price indices, market rates of interest).
4.
The definition of a lease includes agreements for the hire of an asset
which contain a provision giving the hirer an option to acquire title
to the asset upon the fulfillment of agreed conditions. These agreements
are commonly known as hire purchase agreements. Hire purchase agreements
include agreements under which the property in the asset is to pass to
the hirer on the payment of the last instalment and the hirer has a right
to terminate the agreement at any time before the property so passes.
Classification
of Leases
5.
The classification of leases adopted in this Statement is based on the extent
to which risks and rewards incident to ownership of a leased asset lie with
the lessor or the lessee. Risks include the possibilities of losses from
idle capacity or technological obsolescence and of variations in return
due to changing economic conditions. Rewards may be represented by the expectation
of profitable operation over the economic life of the asset and of gain
from appreciation in value or realisation of residual value.
6. A lease is classified as a finance lease if it transfers substantially
all the risks and rewards incident to ownership. Title may or may not eventually
be transferred. A lease is classified as an operating lease if it does not
transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incident to ownership.
7. Since the transaction between a lessor and a lessee is based on a lease
agreement common to both parties, it is appropriate to use consistent definitions.
The application of these definitions to the differing circumstances of the
two parties may sometimes result in the same lease being classified differently
by the lessor and the lessee.
8. Whether a lease is a finance lease or an operating lease depends on the
substance of the transaction rather than its form. Examples of situations
which would normally lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease
are:
- the
lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the
lease term;
- the
lessee has the option to purchase the asset at a price which is expected
to be sufficiently lower than the fair value at the date the option
becomes exercisable such that, at the inception of the lease, it is
reasonably certain that the option will be exercised;
- the
lease term is for the major part of the economic life of the asset even
if title is not transferred;
- at
the inception of the lease the present value of the minimum lease payments
amounts to at least substantially all of the fair value of the leased
asset; and
- the
leased asset is of a specialised nature such that only the lessee can
use it without major modifications being made.
9.
Indicators of situations which individually or in combination could also
lead to a lease being classified as a finance lease are:
- if
the lessee can cancel the lease, the lessor's losses associated with
the cancellation are borne by the lessee;
- gains
or losses from the fluctuation in the fair value of the residual fall
to the lessee (for example in the form of a rent rebate equalling most
of the sales proceeds at the end of the lease); and
- the
lessee can continue the lease for a secondary period at a rent which
is substantially lower than market rent.
10.
Lease classification is made at the inception of the lease. If at any
time the lessee and the lessor agree to change the provisions of the lease,
other than by renewing the lease, in a manner that would have resulted
in a different classification of the lease under the criteria in paragraphs
5 to 9 had the changed terms been in effect at the inception of the lease,
the revised agreement is considered as a new agreement over its revised
term. Changes in estimates (for example, changes in estimates of the economic
life or of the residual value of the leased asset) or changes in circumstances
(for example, default by the lessee), however, do not give rise to a new
classification of a lease for accounting purposes.
Leases
in the Financial Statements of Lessees
Finance
Leases
11.
At the inception of a finance lease, the lessee should recognise the lease
as an asset and a liability. Such recognition should be at an amount equal
to the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease. However,
if the fair value of the leased asset exceeds the present value of the
minimum lease payments from the standpoint of the lessee, the amount recorded
as an asset and a liability should be the present value of the minimum
lease payments from the standpoint of the lessee. In calculating the present
value of the minimum lease payments the discount rate is the interest
rate implicit in the lease, if this is practicable to determine; if not,
the lessee's incremental borrowing rate should be used.
Example
(a) An enterprise (the lessee) acquires a machinery on lease from
a leasing company (the lessor) on January 1, 20X0. The lease term
covers the entire economic life of the machinery, i.e. 3 years.
The fair value of the machinery on January 1, 20X0 is Rs.2,35,500.
The lease agreement requires the lessee to pay an amount of Rs.1,00,000
per year beginning December 31, 20X0. The lessee has guaranteed
a residual value of Rs.17,000 on December 31, 20X2 to the lessor.
The lessor, however, estimates that the machinery would have a salvage
value of only Rs.3,500 on December 31, 20X2.
The interest rate implicit in the lease is 16 per cent (approx.).
This is calculated using the following formula: |
| Fair
value = |
ALR |
+
|
ALR |
+
|
............ |
+
|
ALR |
+
|
RV |
| (1+r)1 |
(1+r)2 |
|
(1+r)n |
(1+r)n |
where
ALR is annual lease rental,
RV is residual value (both guaranteed and unguaranteed),
n is the lease term,
r is interest rate implicit in the lease.
The present value of minimum lease payments from the stand point
of the lessee is Rs.2,35,500.
The lessee would record the machinery as an asset at Rs.2,35,500
with a corresponding liability representing the present value of
lease payments over the lease term (including the guaranteed residual
value).
(b) In the above example, suppose the lessor estimates that the
machinery would have a salvage value of Rs.17,000 on December 31,
20X2. The lessee, however, guarantees a residual value of Rs.5,000
only.
The interest rate implicit in the lease in this case would remain
unchanged at 16% (approx.). The present value of the minimum lease
payments from the standpoint of the lessee, using this interest
rate implicit in the lease, would be Rs.2,27,805. As this amount
is lower than the fair value of the leased asset (Rs. 2,35,500),
the lessee would recognise the asset and the liability arising from
the lease at Rs.2,27,805.
In case the interest rate implicit in the lease is not known to
the lessee, the present value of the minimum lease payments from
the standpoint of the lessee would be computed using the lessee's
incremental borrowing rate. |
12.
Transactions and other events are accounted for and presented in accordance
with their substance and financial reality and not merely with their legal
form. While the legal form of a lease agreement is that the lessee may
acquire no legal title to the leased asset, in the case of finance leases
the substance and financial reality are that the lessee acquires the economic
benefits of the use of the leased asset for the major part of its economic
life in return for entering into an obligation to pay for that right an
amount approximating to the fair value of the asset and the related finance
charge.
13.
If such lease transactions are not reflected in the lessee's balance sheet,
the economic resources and the level of obligations of an enterprise are
understated thereby distorting financial ratios. It is therefore appropriate
that a finance lease be recognised in the lessee's balance sheet both
as an asset and as an obligation to pay future lease payments. At the
inception of the lease, the asset and the liability for the future lease
payments are recognised in the balance sheet at the same amounts.
14.
It is not appropriate to present the liability for a leased asset as a
deduction from the leased asset in the financial statements. The liability
for a leased asset should be presented separately in the balance sheet
as a current liability or a long-term liability as the case may be.
15. Initial direct costs are often incurred in connection with specific
leasing activities, as in negotiating and securing leasing arrangements.
The costs identified as directly attributable to activities performed
by the lessee for a finance lease are included as part of the amount recognised
as an asset under the lease.
16.
Lease payments should be apportioned between the finance charge and the
reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance charge should be allocated
to periods during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic
rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each period.
Example
In the example (a) illustrating
paragraph 11, the lease payments would be apportioned by the lessee
between the finance charge and the reduction of the outstanding
liability as follows.
|
| Year |
Finance
charge
(Rs.) |
Payment
(Rs.) |
Reduction
in
outstanding
liability (Rs.) |
Outstanding
liability
(Rs.) |
| Year
1 |
(January
1) |
|
|
|
2,35,500 |
| |
(December
31) |
37,680 |
1,00,000 |
62,320 |
1,73,180 |
| Year
2 |
(December
31) |
27,709 |
1,00,000 |
72,291 |
1,00,889 |
| Year
3 |
(December
31) |
16,142 |
1,00,000 |
83,858 |
17,031* |
17.
In practice, in allocating the finance charge to periods during the lease
term, some form of approximation may be used to simplify the calculation.
18.
A finance lease gives rise to a depreciation expense for the asset as
well as a finance expense for each accounting period. The depreciation
policy for a leased asset should be consistent with that for depreciable
assets which are owned, and the depreciation recognised should be calculated
on the basis set out in Accounting Standard (AS) 6, Depreciation Accounting.
If there is no reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership
by the end of the lease term, the asset should be fully depreciated over
the lease term or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
19.
The depreciable amount of a leased asset is allocated to each accounting
period during the period of expected use on a systematic basis consistent
with the depreciation policy the lessee adopts for depreciable assets
that are owned. If there is reasonable certainty that the lessee will
obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the period of expected
use is the useful life of the asset; otherwise the asset is depreciated
over the lease term or its useful life, whichever is shorter.
20. The sum of the depreciation expense for the asset and the finance
expense for the period is rarely the same as the lease payments payable
for the period, and it is, therefore, inappropriate simply to recognise
the lease payments payable as an expense in the statement of profit and
loss. Accordingly, the asset and the related liability are unlikely to
be equal in amount after the inception of the lease.
21. To determine whether a leased asset has become impaired, an enterprise
applies the Accounting Standard dealing with impairment of assets, that
sets out the requirements as to how an enterprise should perform the review
of the carrying amount of an asset, how it should determine the recoverable
amount of an asset and when it should recognise, or reverse, an impairment
loss.
22.
The lessee should, in addition to the requirements of AS 10, Accounting
for Fixed Assets, AS 6, Depreciation Accounting, and the governing statute,
make the following disclosures for finance leases:
- assets
acquired under finance lease as segregated from the assets owned;
- for
each class of assets, the net carrying amount at the balance sheet date;
- a
reconciliation between the total of minimum lease payments at the balance
sheet date and their present value. In addition, an enterprise should
disclose the total of minimum lease payments at the balance sheet date,
and their present value, for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- (iii)
later than five years;
- contingent
rents recognised as income in the statement of profit and loss for the
period;
- the
total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under
non-cancellable subleases at the balance sheet date; and
- a
general description of the lessee's significant leasing arrangements
including, but not limited to, the following:
- the
basis on which contingent rent payments are determined;
- the
existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation
clauses; and
- restrictions
imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends,
additional debt, and further leasing.
Operating
Leases
23.
Lease payments under an operating lease should be recognised as an
expense in the statement of profit and loss on a straight line basis
over the lease term unless another systematic basis is more representative
of the time pattern of the user's benefit.
24.
For operating leases, lease payments (excluding costs for services
such as insurance and maintenance) are recognised as an expense in
the statement of profit and loss on a straight line basis unless another
systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern of the
user's benefit, even if the payments are not on that basis.
25.
The lessee should make the following disclosures for operating leases:
- the
total of future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating
leases for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- the
total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received
under non-cancellable subleases at the balance sheet date;
- lease
payments recognised in the statement of profit and loss for the
period, with separate amounts for minimum lease payments and contingent
rents;
- sub-lease
payments received (or receivable) recognised in the statement of
profit and loss for the period;
- a
general description of the lessee's significant leasing arrangements
including, but not limited to, the following:
- the
basis on which contingent rent payments are determined;
- the
existence and terms of renewal or purchase options and escalation
clauses; and
- restrictions
imposed by lease arrangements, such as those concerning dividends,
additional debt, and further leasing.
Leases
in the Financial Statements of Lessors
Finance
Leases
26.
The lessor should recognise assets given under a finance lease in
its balance sheet as a receivable at an amount equal to the net investment
in the lease.
27.
Under a finance lease substantially all the risks and rewards incident
to legal ownership are transferred by the lessor, and thus the lease
payment receivable is treated by the lessor as repayment of principal,
i.e., net investment in the lease, and finance income to reimburse
and reward the lessor for its investment and services.
28.
The recognition of finance income should be based on a pattern reflecting
a constant periodic rate of return on the net investment of the lessor
outstanding in respect of the finance lease.
29.
A lessor aims to allocate finance income over the lease term on a
systematic and rational basis. This income allocation is based on
a pattern reflecting a constant periodic return on the net investment
of the lessor outstanding in respect of the finance lease. Lease payments
relating to the accounting period, excluding costs for services, are
reduced from both the principal and the unearned finance income.
30. Estimated unguaranteed residual values used in computing the lessor's
gross investment in a lease are reviewed regularly. If there has been
a reduction in the estimated unguaranteed residual value, the income
allocation over the remaining lease term is revised and any reduction
in respect of amounts already accrued is recognised immediately. An
upward adjustment of the estimated residual value is not made.
31. Initial direct costs, such as commissions and legal fees, are
often incurred by lessors in negotiating and arranging a lease. For
finance leases, these initial direct costs are incurred to produce
finance income and are either recognised immediately in the statement
of profit and loss or allocated against the finance income over the
lease term.
32.
The manufacturer or dealer lessor should recognise the transaction
of sale in the statement of profit and loss for the period, in accordance
with the policy followed by the enterprise for outright sales. If
artificially low rates of interest are quoted, profit on sale should
be restricted to that which would apply if a commercial rate of interest
were charged. Initial direct costs should be recognised as an expense
in the statement of profit and loss at the inception of the lease.
33.
Manufacturers or dealers may offer to customers the choice of either
buying or leasing an asset. A finance lease of an asset by a manufacturer
or dealer lessor gives rise to two types of income:
(a)
the profit or loss equivalent to the profit or loss resulting from
an outright sale of the asset being leased, at normal selling prices,
reflecting any applicable volume or trade discounts; and
(b) the finance income over the lease term.
34.
The sales revenue recorded at the commencement of a finance lease
term by a manufacturer or dealer lessor is the fair value of the asset.
However, if the present value of the minimum lease payments accruing
to the lessor computed at a commercial rate of interest is lower than
the fair value, the amount recorded as sales revenue is the present
value so computed. The cost of sale recognised at the commencement
of the lease term is the cost, or carrying amount if different, of
the leased asset less the present value of the unguaranteed residual
value. The difference between the sales revenue and the cost of sale
is the selling profit, which is recognised in accordance with the
policy followed by the enterprise for sales.
35. Manufacturer or dealer lessors sometimes quote artificially low
rates of interest in order to attract customers. The use of such a
rate would result in an excessive portion of the total income from
the transaction being recognised at the time of sale. If artificially
low rates of interest are quoted, selling profit would be restricted
to that which would apply if a commercial rate of interest were charged.
36. Initial direct costs are recognised as an expense at the commencement
of the lease term because they are mainly related to earning the manufacturer's
or dealer's selling profit.
37.
The lessor should make the following disclosures for finance leases:
- a
reconciliation between the total gross investment in the lease at
the balance sheet date, and the present value of minimum lease payments
receivable at the balance sheet date. In addition, an enterprise
should disclose the total gross investment in the lease and the
present value of minimum lease payments receivable at the balance
sheet date, for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- unearned
finance income;
- the
unguaranteed residual values accruing to the benefit of the lessor;
- the
accumulated provision for uncollectible minimum lease payments receivable;
- contingent
rents recognised in the statement of profit and loss for the period;
- a
general description of the significant leasing arrangements of the
lessor; and
- accounting
policy adopted in respect of initial direct costs.
38.
As an indicator of growth it is often useful to also disclose the
gross investment less unearned income in new business added during
the accounting period, after deducting the relevant amounts for cancelled
leases.
Operating
Leases
39.
The lessor should present an asset given under operating lease in
its balance sheet under fixed assets.
40. Lease income from operating leases should be recognised in the
statement of profit and loss on a straight line basis over the lease
term, unless another systematic basis is more representative of the
time pattern in which benefit derived from the use of the leased asset
is diminished.
41.
Costs, including depreciation, incurred in earning the lease income
are recognised as an expense. Lease income (excluding receipts for
services provided such as insurance and maintenance) is recognised
in the statement of profit and loss on a straight line basis over
the lease term even if the receipts are not on such a basis, unless
another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern
in which benefit derived from the use of the leased asset is diminished.
42. Initial direct costs incurred specifically to earn revenues from
an operating lease are either deferred and allocated to income over
the lease term in proportion to the recognition of rent income, or
are recognised as an expense in the statement of profit and loss in
the period in which they are incurred.
43.
The depreciation of leased assets should be on a basis consistent
with the normal depreciation policy of the lessor for similar assets,
and the depreciation charge should be calculated on the basis set
out in AS 6, Depreciation Accounting.
44.
To determine whether a leased asset has become impaired, an enterprise
applies the Accounting Standard dealing with impairment of assets
that sets out the requirements for how an enterprise should perform
the review of the carrying amount of an asset, how it should determine
the recoverable amount of an asset and when it should recognise, or
reverse, an impairment loss.
45. A manufacturer or dealer lessor does not recognise any selling
profit on entering into an operating lease because it is not the equivalent
of a sale.
46.
The lessor should, in addition to the requirements of AS 6, Depreciation
Accounting and AS 10, Accounting for Fixed Assets, and the governing
statute, make the following disclosures for operating leases:
- for
each class of assets, the gross carrying amount, the accumulated
depreciation and accumulated impairment losses at the balance sheet
date; and
- the
depreciation recognised in the statement of profit and loss
for the period;
- impairment
losses recognised in the statement of profit and loss for the
period;
- impairment
losses reversed in the statement of profit and loss for the
period;
- the
future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases
in the aggregate and for each of the following periods:
- not
later than one year;
- later
than one year and not later than five years;
- later
than five years;
- total
contingent rents recognised as income in the statement of profit
and loss for the period;
- a
general description of the lessor's significant leasing arrangements;
and
- accounting
policy adopted in respect of initial direct costs.
Sale
and Leaseback Transactions
47.
A sale and leaseback transaction involves the sale of an asset by the
vendor and the leasing of the same asset back to the vendor. The lease
payments and the sale price are usually interdependent as they are negotiated
as a package. The accounting treatment of a sale and leaseback transaction
depends upon the type of lease involved.
48. If a sale and leaseback transaction results in a finance lease,
any excess or deficiency of sales proceeds over the carrying amount should
not be immediately recognised as income or loss in the financial statements
of a seller-lessee. Instead, it should be deferred and amortised over
the lease term in proportion to the depreciation of the leased asset.
49. If the leaseback is a finance lease, it is not appropriate to regard
an excess of sales proceeds over the carrying amount as income. Such excess
is deferred and amortised over the lease term in proportion to the depreciation
of the leased asset. Similarly, it is not appropriate to regard a deficiency
as loss. Such deficiency is deferred and amortised over the lease term.
50. If a sale and leaseback transaction results in an operating lease,
and it is clear that the transaction is established at fair value, any
profit or loss should be recognised immediately. If the sale price is
below fair value, any profit or loss should be recognised immediately
except that, if the loss is compensated by future lease payments at below
market price, it should be deferred and amortised in proportion to the
lease payments over the period for which the asset is expected to be used.
If the sale price is above fair value, the excess over fair value should
be deferred and amortised over the period for which the asset is expected
to be used.
51. If the leaseback is an operating lease, and the lease payments and
the sale price are established at fair value, there has in effect been
a normal sale transaction and any profit or loss is recognised immediately.
52. For operating leases, if the fair value at the time of a sale and
leaseback transaction is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a
loss equal to the amount of the difference between the carrying amount
and fair value should be recognised immediately.
53. For finance leases, no such adjustment is necessary unless there has
been an impairment in value, in which case the carrying amount is reduced
to recoverable amount in accordance with the Accounting Standard dealing
with impairment of assets.
54. Disclosure requirements for lessees and lessors apply equally to sale
and leaseback transactions. The required description of the significant
leasing arrangements leads to disclosure of unique or unusual provisions
of the agreement or terms of the sale and leaseback transactions..
55. Sale and leaseback transactions may meet the separate disclosure criteria
set out in paragraph 12 of Accounting Standard (AS) 5, Net Profit or Loss
for the Period, Prior Period Items and Changes in Accounting Policies..
Appendix
Sale
and Leaseback Transactions that Result in Operating Leases
The
appendix is illustrative only and does not form part of the accounting
standard. The purpose of this appendix is to illustrate the application
of the accounting standard.
A sale and leaseback transaction that results in an operating lease may
give rise to profit or a loss, the determination and treatment of which
depends on the leased asset's carrying amount, fair value and selling
price. The following table shows the requirements of the accounting standard
in various circumstances.
| Sale
price established at fair value (paragraph 50) |
Carrying
amount equal to fair value |
Carrying
amount less than fair value |
Carrying
amount above fair value |
| |
|
|
|
| Profit |
No
profit |
Recognise
profit immediately |
Not
applicable |
| Loss |
No
loss |
Not
applicable |
Recognise
loss immediately |
| Sale
price below fair value (paragraph 50) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Profit
|
No
profit |
Recognise
profit immediately |
No
profit (note 1) |
| Loss
not compensated by future lease payments at below market price
|
Recognise
loss immediately |
Recognise
loss immediately |
(note
1) |
| Loss
compensated by future lease payments at below market price
|
Defer
and amortise loss |
Defer
and amortise loss |
(note
1) |
| Sale
price above fair value (paragraph 50) |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| Profit
|
Defer
and amortise profit |
Defer
and amortise profit |
Defer
and amortise profit (note 2) |
| Loss
|
No
loss |
No
loss |
(note
1) |
Note 1. These parts of the table represent
circumstances that would have been dealt with under paragraph 52 of the
Standard. Paragraph 52 requires the carrying amount of an asset to be
written down to fair value where it is subject to a sale and leaseback.
Note 2. The profit would be the difference between fair value and sale
price as the carrying amount would have been written down to fair value
in accordance with paragraph 52.
|
|